
Monday, October 4, 2010
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Thursday, September 30, 2010
To Touch...
12Now when he came nigh to the gate of the city, behold, there was a dead man carried out, the only son of his mother, and she was a widow: and much people of the city was with her.
13And when the Lord saw her, he had compassion on her, and said unto her, Weep not.
14And he came and touched the bier: and they that bare him stood still. And he said, Young man, I say unto thee, Arise.
15And he that was dead sat up, and began to speak. And he delivered him to his mother.
16And there came a fear on all: and they glorified God, saying, That a great prophet is risen up among us; and, That God hath visited his people.
Luke 7:11-16
Well, literally translated from the Greek language the word used is "haptomai" (ἅπτομαι) which can mean "to touch" or more properly "to attach oneself to". Jesus didn't just go up to that boy and touch him, he gripped him. I mean yeah...the people who were carrying him would probably stop and look at him but attach himself to him...a dead boy...
Sure when he touched the eyes of people he was probably not gripping them, but the people with leprosy...did he just touch them, or like this dead boy, did he grab them...hold on to them?
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Do you like me?...
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Thinking...
I have a question...why is the forbidden fruit in the Bible always depicted as an apple in pictures and what not? Where in the Bible does it specifically say...Eve ate the "apple". It never does...so why do we always perceive it as an apple? Was it even really an apple? I mean, what if it was fig or quince (which are very common in the Middle Eastern, Mediterranean area)? What if it's a fruit that we don't even know existed because it was forbidden and there is only mention of one tree and it is in the Garden of Eden? Who decided it was an apple?
Ok I lied...I have a 2nd question...Satan is called "the morning star" or "the angel of light" but only once in the Bible (only some versions actually) does it refer to him as "Lucifer" (Isaiah 14:12). When the Bible was being translated from latin, lucifer was a combination of the two latin words lux or lucis meaning "light" and ferre meaning "to bring" or "to bear".
"quomodo cecidisti de caelo lucifer qui mane oriebaris corruisti in terram qui vulnerabas gentes." Isaiah 14:12
"How art thou fallen from heaven, O lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!" Isaiah 14:12
So is Lucifer a name we gave him, or is it a legit name of his?
